Magdalena Kubicka v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case numbers: A089-144-862, A089-144-856. Copies to all parties and the agency. [999741525]. [15-1553]

Appeal: 15-1553

Doc: 24

Filed: 01/26/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1553

MAGDALENA
Girczac,

KUBICKA;

ARKADIUSZ

GURCZAK,

a/k/a

Arkadiusz

Petitioners,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.

Submitted:

January 19, 2016

Before WILKINSON and
Senior Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided:

Circuit

January 26, 2016

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioners.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director,
Laura M.L. Maroldy, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1553

Doc: 24

Filed: 01/26/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Petitioners Magdalena Kubicka and Arkadiusz Gurczak, both
natives and citizens of Poland, seek review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal of
the

Immigration

continuance

or

Judge’s

decision

administrative

denying

their

closure.

motion

We

have

for

a

reviewed

petitioners’ claims and the administrative record and find no
abuse of discretion.
(4th Cir. 2007).

See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review

for the reasons stated by the Board.
Apr. 23, 2015).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

See In re: Kubicka (B.I.A.

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2