Bismark Torkornoo v. Mary Torkornoo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-00980-PJM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999626010]. Mailed to: appellant. [15-1556]

Appeal: 15-1556

Doc: 12

Filed: 07/23/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1556

BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARY TORKORNOO; JACQUELINE E. NGOLE, Esquire; NINA HELWIG,
Esquire (BIA); JOHN C. MONAHAN, Esquire; JUDGE CYNTHIA
CALLAHAN; MASTER CLARK WISOR,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge.
(8:15-cv-00980-PJM)

Submitted:

July 21, 2015

Decided:

July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1556

Doc: 12

Filed: 07/23/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo appeals the district court’s order
dismissing

without

domestic-relations
jurisdiction. *
error.

his

proceedings

suit

for

challenging

lack

of

Maryland

subject-matter

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

Torkornoo v. Torkornoo, No. 8:15-cv-00980-PJM (D.

Md. Apr. 29, 2015).
facts

prejudice

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We conclude that the dismissal order is final and
appealable.
See In re GNC Corp., ___ F.3d ___, ___, 2015 WL
3798174, at *9 n.3 (4th Cir. June 19, 2015) (discussing standard
for determining finality of order).
2