Stephen Yelverton v. Yelverton Farms, Ltd.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999590559-2]; denying Motion to remand case [999621754-2], denying Motion to remand case [999641178-2], denying Motion to remand case [999657199-2]; denying Motion to file supplemental brief(s) [999687555-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00365-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999704420]. Mailed to: attorneys John Bircher and John Marshall. [15-1558]--[Edited 11/23/2015 by ALC]
Appeal: 15-1558
Doc: 21
Filed: 11/23/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1558
STEPHEN THOMAS YELVERTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
YELVERTON FARMS, LTD.; PHYLLIS Y. EDMUNDSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00365-FL)
Submitted:
October 30, 2015
Decided:
November 23, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Thomas Yelverton, Appellant Pro Se.
John C. Bircher,
III, WHITE & ALLEN, PA, New Bern, North Carolina; John Pierce
Marshall, Matthew Scott Sullivan, WHITE & ALLEN, PA, Kinston,
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1558
Doc: 21
Filed: 11/23/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Thomas Yelverton appeals from the district court’s
orders dismissing his complaint against Yelverton Farms, Ltd.,
and Phyllis Y. Edmundson for lack of standing and for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and denying his
motion for reconsideration and for leave to amend the complaint.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
the
parties’
appeal, and we find no reversible error.
arguments
on
Accordingly, we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Yelverton v. Yelverton Farms,
Ltd., No. 5:14-cv-00365-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2015; Apr. 22,
2015).
deny
We deny Yelverton’s motion to remand the case, and we
his
motion
for
leave
to
file
a
supplemental
brief
addressing issues he intends to present on appeal from an order
entered in a separate case in the district court.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?