In re: Larry McDaniel

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999598313-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus as moot (FRAP 21) [999590567-2]. Originating case number: 5:11-cr-00252-D-1,5:15-cv-00041-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999633545]. Mailed to: Larry McDaniel. [15-1560]

Appeal: 15-1560

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/04/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1560

In Re: LARRY MAX MCDANIEL,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:11-cr-00252-D-1; 5:15-cv-00041-D)

Submitted:

July 1, 2015

Decided:

August 4, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Max McDaniel, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1560

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/04/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Larry

Max

McDaniel

petitions

for

a

writ

of

mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.

He seeks an order from this court

directing the district court to act.
court’s

docket

reveals

that

the

Our review of the district

district

court

has

recently

issued an order directing McDaniel to file a corrected § 2255
motion.

Accordingly, because the district court has recently

acted in this case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

We

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2