Robert Broughton, Jr. v. John McClain, Jr.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying motion for reconsideration [999652409-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00454-H Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999807771].. [15-1569]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1569 Doc: 93 Filed: 04/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1569 CELESTE G. BROUGHTON, Plaintiff – Appellant, and ROBERT B. BROUGHTON, JR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN N. MCCLAIN, JR.; ROBERT GALEY; WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00454-H) Submitted: April 26, 2016 Decided: April 29, 2016 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Celeste G. Broughton, Appellant Pro Se. William Sidney Aldridge, NICHOLLS & CRAMPTON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Debbie Weston Harden, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Appeal: 15-1569 Doc: 93 Filed: 04/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-1569 Doc: 93 Filed: 04/29/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Celeste denying her G. Broughton post-judgment district court judge. appeals motion the for district court’s disqualification order of the We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. deny Broughton’s this court’s We also reconsideration of most prior recent order motion for substituting the bankruptcy trustee as the Appellant as moot, as the trustee has been removed as the Appellant. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?