Nancy Lund v. Rowan County, North Carolina
Filing
Case reopened upon grant of rehearing/rehearing en banc. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00207-JAB-JLW. [15-1591]
Appeal: 15-1591
Doc: 80
Filed: 10/31/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
FILED: October 31, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 15-1591
(1:13-cv-00207-JAB-JLW)
___________________
NANCY LUND; LIESA MONTAG-SIEGEL; ROBERT VOELKER
Plaintiffs - Appellees
v.
ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant - Appellant
-----------------------------STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ARIZONA;
STATE OF ARKANSAS; STATE OF FLORIDA; STATE OF INDIANA; STATE
OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF
OHIO; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; STATE OF
TEXAS; MEMBERS OF CONGRESS
Amici Supporting Appellant
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE;
AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION; ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE;
CENTER FOR INQUIRY; FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION;
INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION; SIKH COALITION; UNION FOR
REFORM JUDAISM; WOMEN OF REFORM JUDAISM
Amici Supporting Appellee
Appeal: 15-1591
Doc: 80
Filed: 10/31/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
___________________
ORDER
___________________
A majority of judges in regular active service and not disqualified having
voted in a requested poll of the court to grant the petition for rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc is granted.
The parties and any amici curiae shall file 16 additional paper copies of their
briefs and appendices previously filed in this case within 10 days. The parties may
move, or the court may sua sponte order, the filing of supplemental en banc briefs
pursuant to Local Rule 35(d).
This case is tentatively calendared for oral argument at the January 24-26,
2017, session of court.
For the Court
/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?