Nancy Lund v. Rowan County, North Carolina

Filing

Case reopened upon grant of rehearing/rehearing en banc. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00207-JAB-JLW. [15-1591]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1591 Doc: 80 Filed: 10/31/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 FILED: October 31, 2016 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 15-1591 (1:13-cv-00207-JAB-JLW) ___________________ NANCY LUND; LIESA MONTAG-SIEGEL; ROBERT VOELKER Plaintiffs - Appellees v. ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Defendant - Appellant -----------------------------STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF ARKANSAS; STATE OF FLORIDA; STATE OF INDIANA; STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF OHIO; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; STATE OF TEXAS; MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Amici Supporting Appellant AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE; AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION; ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE; CENTER FOR INQUIRY; FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION; INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION; SIKH COALITION; UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM; WOMEN OF REFORM JUDAISM Amici Supporting Appellee Appeal: 15-1591 Doc: 80 Filed: 10/31/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 ___________________ ORDER ___________________ A majority of judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in a requested poll of the court to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc is granted. The parties and any amici curiae shall file 16 additional paper copies of their briefs and appendices previously filed in this case within 10 days. The parties may move, or the court may sua sponte order, the filing of supplemental en banc briefs pursuant to Local Rule 35(d). This case is tentatively calendared for oral argument at the January 24-26, 2017, session of court. For the Court /s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?