Keith Robertson v. Commissioner of Intl Revenue

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to remand case [999636647-2], denying Motion to remand case [999633995-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999624960-2] Originating case number: 4947-14 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999680429]. Mailed to: Robertson. [15-1623]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1623 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1623 KEITH ROBERTSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (No. 4947-14) Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Senior Attorney, Richard Caldarone, Caroline D. Ciraolo, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax Division, Washington, D.C.; William J. Wilkins, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1623 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Keith Robertson appeals the tax court’s order denying his request for a continuance failure to prosecute. reversible error. and dismissing his petition for We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Robertson v. Comm’r, Tax Ct. No. 4947-14 (U.S. Tax Ct. Mar. 10, 2015). We deny Robertson’s motions to remand and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?