Wasim Ata Bey ex rel. v. J. W. Mitchell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:15-cv-00044-RAJ-LRL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999650433]. Mailed to: Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey. [15-1634]

Appeal: 15-1634

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/31/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1634

WASIM ATA BEY EX REL ERICK SEALEY, an individual,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. W. MITCHELL, 1709 VSP, an individual; DAVID A. PATRICK,
0304 YCSO, an individual; THOMAS CHABOT, 5543 YCSO, an
individual; JASON STUMP, 4318 YCSO, an individual; DONALD
MICKET, 5583 YCSO, an individual; BYRON EVANS, 2231 YCSO,
an individual; DONNA MAW, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney, an
individual;
JAMES
LAMPRECHT,
York
Magistrate,
an
individual; STEPHEN A. HUDGINS, Chief Judge, an individual;
JEFFREY
SHAW,
Circuit
Judge,
an
individual;
MICHAEL
SOBERICK, SR., Judge, an individual,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:15-cv-00044-RAJ-LRL)

Submitted:

August 27, 2015

Decided:

August 31, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1634

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/31/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff Wasim Ata Bey ex rel Erick Sealey (Ata Bey) seeks
to

appeal

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing

without

prejudice his civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)
(2012) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be
granted.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral

orders.

54(b); Cohen
545-47

v.

court

U.S.C.

Beneficial

(1949).

district

28

Because
may

be

the

§ 1292

Indus.

(2012);

Loan

Corp.,

deficiencies

remedied

by

the

Fed.

R.

337

Civ.

U.S.

identified

filing

of

by

an

P.

541,
the

amended

complaint, we conclude that the order Ata Bey seeks to appeal is
neither

a

final

collateral order.

order

nor

an

appealable

interlocutory

or

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local

Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly,
jurisdiction.

we

dismiss

the

appeal

for

lack

of

We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2