Southern Management Corp. v. Chawky Jabaly
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to impose sanctions [999694014-2]; denying Motion to dismiss appeal [999693896-2]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00197-LO-IDD,10-12956-BFK,10-01478-BFK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999737293]. Mailed to: Chawky Jabaly. [15-1666]
Appeal: 15-1666
Doc: 28
Filed: 01/19/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1666
SOUTHERN MANAGEMENT CORPORATION RETIREMENT TRUST,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHAWKY BOUTROS JABALY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-00197-LO-IDD)
Submitted:
January 14, 2016
Decided:
January 19, 2016
Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chawky Boutros Jabaly, Appellant Pro Se. Gabrielle Marcus Duvall,
LINOWES & BLOCHER, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1666
Doc: 28
Filed: 01/19/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Chawky Boutros Jabaly appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying
his fourth motion for reconsideration of its order entering a
nondischargeable
consent
judgment
against
Jabaly.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Southern
Mgmt. Corp. Retirement Trust v. Jabaly, No. 1:15-cv-00197-LO-IDD
(E.D. Va. May 15, 2015).
We deny Southern Management Corporation
Retirement Trust’s motions to dismiss and for sanctions.
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?