Paul Bird v. John Driscoll, III

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999604830-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999615961-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01326-GLR,13-28238,14-00191 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999683903]. Mailed to: Paul Charles Bird 3416 Hopkins Avenue Baltimore, MD 21227. [15-1668]

Appeal: 15-1668

Doc: 21

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1668

PAUL CHARLES BIRD, a/k/a Paul Charles Bird, Sr.,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
JOHN E. DRISCOLL, III; ROBERT E. FRAZIER; JANA M. GANTT;
LAURA D. HARRIS; KIMBERLY LANE BITT; DEENA REYNOLDS; UNKNOWN
DEFENDANTS 1 THROUGH 10; HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, as
Successor to Union Federal Savings Bank, and Assigns; BANK
OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,
Defendants – Appellees,
v.
MONIQUE D. ALMY,
Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-01326-GLR)

Submitted:

October 20, 2015

Decided:

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

October 22, 2015

Appeal: 15-1668

Doc: 21

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Paul Charles Bird, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Harvey Hillman,
SAMUEL I. WHITE PC, Rockville, Maryland; Ronald S. Canter, LAW
OFFICES OF RONALD S. CANTER, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-1668

Doc: 21

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Paul

Charles

Bird

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

accepting the recommendation of the bankruptcy court judge and
dismissing

Bird’s

amended

complaint

proceeding in the bankruptcy court.
and find no reversible error.

filed

as

an

adversary

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, although we grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.

Bird v. Driscoll, No. 1:15-cv-

01326-GLR (D. Md. May 20, 2015).

We deny Bird’s motion for the

preparation of a transcript at government expense.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3