James Davenport v. Sallie Mae, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:12-cv-01475-PJM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999705780]. Mailed to: James Davenport. [15-1677]

Appeal: 15-1677

Doc: 17

Filed: 11/24/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1677

JAMES E. DAVENPORT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SALLIE MAE, INC.; SLM CORPORATION,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
EQUIFAX, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; EXPERIAN
DATA CORP.; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS
UNION, LLC,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-01475-PJM)

Submitted:

October 29, 2015

Before NIEMEYER
Circuit Judge.

and

DIAZ,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

November 24, 2015

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Appeal: 15-1677

Doc: 17

Filed: 11/24/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

James E. Davenport, Appellant Pro Se. John S. Bolesta, Denise E.
Giraudo, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington,
D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-1677

Doc: 17

Filed: 11/24/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
James

E.

Davenport

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

granting summary judgment in favor of defendants in this civil
action.
error.
district

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
court.

Davenport

v.

Sallie

8:12-cv-01475-PJM (D. Md. June 5, 2015).

Mae,

Inc.,

No.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3