Christine Lucas v. Jonnie Lucas, Sr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-01435-PWG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999683922]. Mailed to: Christine Lucas. [15-1693]
Appeal: 15-1693
Doc: 13
Filed: 10/22/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1693
CHRISTINE M. LUCAS, Trustee Robert Lucas Family Trust,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JONNIE LUCAS, SR.; RICHARD HIGH, SR.; HONORABLE JUDGE JOHN
W. DEBELIUS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:15cv-01435-PWG)
Submitted:
October 20, 2015
Decided:
October 22, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christine M. Lucas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1693
Doc: 13
Filed: 10/22/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Christine
M.
Lucas
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing her civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant
to
the
Rooker–Feldman *
doctrine.
On
appeal,
we
confine
review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
Cir. R. 34(b).
the
basis
for
our
See 4th
Because Lucas’ informal brief does not challenge
the
district
court’s
disposition,
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Lucas
has
Accordingly,
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983);
Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?