Robert Donaldson v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: DC-1221-12-0356-B-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999717446]. Mailed to: Robert Donnell Donaldson. [15-1694]
Appeal: 15-1694
Doc: 32
Filed: 12/14/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1694
ROBERT DONNELL DONALDSON,
Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent,
and
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Intervenor.
On Petition for
Protection Board.
Submitted:
Review of an Order
(DC-1221-12-0356-B-1)
November 30, 2015
of
the
Decided:
Merit
Systems
December 14, 2015
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Donnell Donaldson, Petitioner Pro Se. Katherine Michelle
Smith, U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Washington, D.C.,
for Respondent.
Joshua Ethan Kurland, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Intervenor.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1694
Doc: 32
Filed: 12/14/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Donnell Donaldson seeks review of the Merit Systems
Protection
Board’s
retaliation appeal.
order
2015).
not
dismissing
his
whistleblower
See 5 U.S.C.A. § 7703(b)(1)(B) (West Supp.
Our review of the record discloses that the Board did
err
in
Donaldson’s
concluding
appeal.
that
it
Accordingly,
lacked
we
deny
review for the reasons stated by the Board.
jurisdiction
the
petition
over
for
Donaldson v. Dep’t
of Homeland Sec., No. DC-1221-12-0356-B-1 (M.S.P.B. Sept. 16,
2014).
We
further
deny
Donaldson’s
motions
for
summary
disposition, to strike the Board’s entire brief, and to verify
the record.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?