Cornell Cornish v. Baltimore City

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to exceed length limitations [999647427-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999674148-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03117-GLR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999683783]. Mailed to: Cornell Cornish. [15-1709]

Appeal: 15-1709

Doc: 19

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1709

CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE CITY; CITY COUNCIL; MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF THE
CITY COUNCIL,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-03117-GLR)

Submitted:

October 20, 2015

Decided:

October 22, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish, Appellant Pro Se.
Frederic Nelson
Smalkin,
Jr.,
Assistant
Solicitor,
BALTIMORE
CITY
LAW
DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1709

Doc: 19

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

Judge

appeals

PER CURIAM:
Cornell

D.M.

Cornish

the

district

court’s

orders dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim
upon which relief could be granted, and denying reconsideration.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Cornish v. Balt. City, No. 1:14-cv-03117-GLR (D. Md. May

15, 2015, June 26, 2015).

We grant Cornish’s motion for leave

to file a reply brief exceeding this Court’s length limitations
and deny his motion to add copyrighted work to the appeal.
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2