In Re: Jimmy Nance
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999623689-2]; dismissing Motion for extraordinary writ under FRAP 21 filed by Petitioner Jimmy Lawrence Nance [999613883-2] Originating case number: 7:92-cr-00135-JPJ-RSB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999678472]. Mailed to: Jimmy Nance. [15-1734]
Appeal: 15-1734
Doc: 6
Filed: 10/15/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1734
In Re:
JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
(7:92-cr-00135-JPJ-RSB-1)
Submitted:
September 29, 2015
Decided:
October 15, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1734
Doc: 6
Filed: 10/15/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Lawrence Nance filed a petition for an original writ
of
habeas
corpus
challenging
his
1993
conviction
for
first
degree murder of a United States Postal Service employee, in
violation
ordinarily
of
18
U.S.C.
declines
to
§§ 1111,
entertain
1114
(2014).
original
This
habeas
court
corpus
petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), and this case provides
no reason to depart from the general rule.
that
the
interests
of
justice
would
Moreover, we find
not
transferring the case to the district court.
§ 1631 (2012).
be
served
by
See 28 U.S.C.
Accordingly, we deny Nance leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the petition.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?