Michael Ruth v. City of Creedmoor

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999634233-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00862-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999707938]. Mailed to: Ruth. [15-1745]

Appeal: 15-1745

Doc: 17

Filed: 11/30/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1745

MICHAEL RUTH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CREEDMOOR; ROBERT G. MORRIS, in his official and
individual capacities; JOHN DOES 1-10, in their official and
individual capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00862-BR)

Submitted:

November 10, 2015

Decided:

November 30, 2015

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Ruth, Appellant Pro Se. Dan M. Hartzog, Jr., CRANFILL,
SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1745

Doc: 17

Filed: 11/30/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Michael Ruth appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

See

Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, No. 5:13-cv-00862-BR (E.D.N.C. June
30, 2015).
dispense

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2