Cleo Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03184-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999738617]. Mailed to: Christopher. [15-1769]
Appeal: 15-1769
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/20/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1769
CLEO ANTHANETT CHRISTOPHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC.; STEPHANIE ARCHERSMITH, Executive Director; PORTIA MCCONNELL, Director of
Children Services; MICHELLE YOUNG, Regional Director; TONI
ADAIR, Sr. Family Services Coordinator; JOHN J. SCHIAVONE,
Executive Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-03184-RDB)
Submitted:
December 28, 2015
Decided:
January 20, 2016
Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleo Anthanett Christopher, Appellant Pro Se.
James Douglas
Bragdon, Brian Travis Tucker, GALLAGHER EVELIUS & JONES, LLP,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1769
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/20/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Cleo
Anthanett
Christopher
appeals
the
district
court’s
order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore, Inc.,
No. 1:14-cv-03184-RDB (D. Md. filed June 11, 2015 & entered June
12, 2015).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?