Cleo Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-03184-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999738617]. Mailed to: Christopher. [15-1769]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1769 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1769 CLEO ANTHANETT CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC.; STEPHANIE ARCHERSMITH, Executive Director; PORTIA MCCONNELL, Director of Children Services; MICHELLE YOUNG, Regional Director; TONI ADAIR, Sr. Family Services Coordinator; JOHN J. SCHIAVONE, Executive Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03184-RDB) Submitted: December 28, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2016 Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cleo Anthanett Christopher, Appellant Pro Se. James Douglas Bragdon, Brian Travis Tucker, GALLAGHER EVELIUS & JONES, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1769 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Cleo Anthanett Christopher appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Christopher v. St. Vincent De Paul of Baltimore, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-03184-RDB (D. Md. filed June 11, 2015 & entered June 12, 2015). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?