In Re: Alexander Asa-Kwapong

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999620723-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999628765-2]; denying as moot Motion to expedite decision [999628766-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cr-00416-GBL-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999680619]. Mailed to: Alexander Asa-Kwapong. [15-1780]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1780 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1780 In re: ALEXANDER ASA-KWAPONG, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:12-cr-00416-GBL-1) Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexander Asa-Kwapong, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1780 Doc: 12 Filed: 10/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Alexander Asa-Kwapong petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motions for discovery. He seeks directing the district court to act. court’s docket motions. reveals that the an order from this court Our review of the district district court denied the Accordingly, because the district court has recently ruled on Asa-Kwapong’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny as moot the motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?