In Re: Alexander Asa-Kwapong
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999620723-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999628765-2]; denying as moot Motion to expedite decision [999628766-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cr-00416-GBL-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999680619]. Mailed to: Alexander Asa-Kwapong. [15-1780]
Appeal: 15-1780
Doc: 12
Filed: 10/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1780
In re: ALEXANDER ASA-KWAPONG,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:12-cr-00416-GBL-1)
Submitted:
October 15, 2015
Decided:
October 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Asa-Kwapong, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1780
Doc: 12
Filed: 10/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander
Asa-Kwapong
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
motions
for
discovery.
He
seeks
directing the district court to act.
court’s
docket
motions.
reveals
that
the
an
order
from
this
court
Our review of the district
district
court
denied
the
Accordingly, because the district court has recently
ruled on Asa-Kwapong’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as
moot.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny as
moot the motion to expedite.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?