In re: David Johnson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999628388-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999621130-2]. Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02130-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999683801]. Mailed to: David Johnson. [15-1783]
Appeal: 15-1783
Doc: 6
Filed: 10/22/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1783
In re:
DAVID HAROLD JOHNSON
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(No. 5:15-hc-02130-BO)
Submitted:
October 20, 2015
Decided:
October 22, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Harold Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1783
Doc: 6
Filed: 10/22/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David
directing
Harold
the
Johnson
district
state court convictions.
mandamus.
petitions
court
to
for
a
writ
immediately
of
mandamus,
vacate
Johnson’s
Such relief is not available by way of
See In re First Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138
(4th Cir. 1988) (holding mandamus petitioner must have clear
right to relief sought); In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d
351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007) (holding mandamus is not substitute for
appeal).
Accordingly,
we
grant
leave
pauperis and deny the mandamus petition.
to
proceed
in
forma
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?