In re: David Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999628388-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999621130-2]. Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02130-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999683801]. Mailed to: David Johnson. [15-1783]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1783 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1783 In re: DAVID HAROLD JOHNSON Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. 5:15-hc-02130-BO) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Harold Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1783 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: David directing Harold the Johnson district state court convictions. mandamus. petitions court to for a writ immediately of mandamus, vacate Johnson’s Such relief is not available by way of See In re First Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988) (holding mandamus petitioner must have clear right to relief sought); In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007) (holding mandamus is not substitute for appeal). Accordingly, we grant leave pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. to proceed in forma We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?