Karin Zander v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999623395-2]. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00857-WO-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999702265]. Mailed to: Karin Zander. [15-1792]
Appeal: 15-1792
Doc: 19
Filed: 11/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1792
KARIN KIRKSEY ZANDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; MORGAN STANLEY &
INCORPORATED; OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
William L. Osteen,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-00857-WO-JEP)
Submitted:
November 17, 2015
Decided:
November 19, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karin Kirksey Zander, Appellant Pro Se.
Cassandra Lauren
Crawford, Donald Richard Pocock, NELSON MULLINS RILEY &
SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Dennis Kyle
Deak, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1792
Doc: 19
Filed: 11/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Karin
Kirksey
Zander
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying her motion to remand and dismissing her civil action
challenging the reporting of a prior foreclosure proceeding.
have
reviewed
the
record
Accordingly,
although
pauperis,
affirm
court.
we
we
for
and
grant
the
find
no
reversible
leave
to
proceed
reasons
stated
by
the
We
error.
in
forma
district
Zander v. Saxon Mortg. Servs., Inc., No. 1:14-cv-00857-
WO-JEP (M.D.N.C. June 18, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?