Karin Zander v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999623395-2]. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00857-WO-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999702265]. Mailed to: Karin Zander. [15-1792]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1792 Doc: 19 Filed: 11/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1792 KARIN KIRKSEY ZANDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; MORGAN STANLEY & INCORPORATED; OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-00857-WO-JEP) Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karin Kirksey Zander, Appellant Pro Se. Cassandra Lauren Crawford, Donald Richard Pocock, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Dennis Kyle Deak, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1792 Doc: 19 Filed: 11/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Karin Kirksey Zander appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to remand and dismissing her civil action challenging the reporting of a prior foreclosure proceeding. have reviewed the record Accordingly, although pauperis, affirm court. we we for and grant the find no reversible leave to proceed reasons stated by the We error. in forma district Zander v. Saxon Mortg. Servs., Inc., No. 1:14-cv-00857- WO-JEP (M.D.N.C. June 18, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?