Raleigh Anderson v. United States of America

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999641604-2] Originating case number: 4:15-cv-00003-JLK-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999702219]. Mailed to: Raleigh Anderson. [15-1825]

Appeal: 15-1825

Doc: 15

Filed: 11/19/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1825

RALEIGH ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; GEORGE MCCONNELL,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:15-cv-00003-JLK-RSB)

Submitted:

November 17, 2015

Decided:

November 19, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raleigh Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1825

Doc: 15

Filed: 11/19/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Raleigh

Anderson

appeals

dismissing his complaint.

the

district

bases

See 4th Cir. R.

Because Anderson’s informal brief does not challenge the
for

the

district

court’s

disposition,

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
we

grant

affirm

order

On appeal, we confine our review to

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
34(b).

court’s

Anderson’s

the

district

motion

to

court’s

proceed

order.

in
We

forma

Anderson

has

Accordingly,
pauperis

dispense

with

and
oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2