Raleigh Anderson v. United States of America
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999641604-2] Originating case number: 4:15-cv-00003-JLK-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999702219]. Mailed to: Raleigh Anderson. [15-1825]
Appeal: 15-1825
Doc: 15
Filed: 11/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1825
RALEIGH ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; GEORGE MCCONNELL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:15-cv-00003-JLK-RSB)
Submitted:
November 17, 2015
Decided:
November 19, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raleigh Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1825
Doc: 15
Filed: 11/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Raleigh
Anderson
appeals
dismissing his complaint.
the
district
bases
See 4th Cir. R.
Because Anderson’s informal brief does not challenge the
for
the
district
court’s
disposition,
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
we
grant
affirm
order
On appeal, we confine our review to
the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
34(b).
court’s
Anderson’s
the
district
motion
to
court’s
proceed
order.
in
We
forma
Anderson
has
Accordingly,
pauperis
dispense
with
and
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?