Raleigh Anderson v. United States of America


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999641604-2] Originating case number: 4:15-cv-00003-JLK-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999702219]. Mailed to: Raleigh Anderson. [15-1825]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1825 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1825 RALEIGH ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee, and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; GEORGE MCCONNELL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:15-cv-00003-JLK-RSB) Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raleigh Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1825 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Raleigh Anderson appeals dismissing his complaint. the district bases See 4th Cir. R. Because Anderson’s informal brief does not challenge the for the district court’s disposition, forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. we grant affirm order On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. 34(b). court’s Anderson’s the district motion to court’s proceed order. in We forma Anderson has Accordingly, pauperis dispense with and oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?