Franklin Ogi v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--dismissing petition for review filed by Petitioner Franklin Chukuyem Ogi [999632419-2] Originating case number: A096-838-344 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999702296]. Mailed to: Franklin Ogi. [15-1854]

Appeal: 15-1854

Doc: 9

Filed: 11/19/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1854

FRANKLIN CHUKUYEM OGI,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.

Submitted:

November 16, 2015

Decided:

November 19, 2015

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin Chukuyem Ogi, Petitioner Pro Se. Surell Brady, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1854

Doc: 9

Filed: 11/19/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Franklin Chukuyem Ogi, a native and citizen of Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s finding that Ogi was
not credible and that he failed to demonstrate extreme hardship
so as to establish eligibility for special rule cancellation of
removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2) (2012).

Because Ogi

raises no constitutional claims or questions of law, we lack
jurisdiction

to

review

the

denial

of

relief.

See

8

U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(2)(B), (D) (2012); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475,
479-80 (4th Cir. 2006).
review.
legal
before

We accordingly dismiss the petition for

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

PETITION DISMISSED

2