In re: Travis Denorris Arnold

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999634731-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00322-TDS-1,1:15-cv-00498-WO-JEP,1:15-cv-00499-WO-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999722162]. Mailed to: Travis Arnold. [15-1869]

Appeal: 15-1869

Doc: 18

Filed: 12/21/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1869

In re:

TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(Nos. 1:08-cr-00322-TDS-1; 1:15-cv-00498-WO-JEP;
1:15-cv-00499-WO-JEP)

Submitted:

December 17, 2015

Decided:

December 21, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis Denorris Arnold, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1869

Doc: 18

Filed: 12/21/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Travis Denorris Arnold petitions for a writ of mandamus
seeking an order granting him release from his federal sentence.
We conclude that Arnold is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only
in extraordinary circumstances.

Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426

U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509,
516-17 (4th Cir. 2003).

Further, mandamus relief is available

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought.
In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.
1988).

Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal.

In

re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).
The relief sought by Arnold is not available by way of
mandamus.
mandamus.
legal
before

Accordingly,

we

deny

the

petition

for

writ

of

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

2