Paul A. Mitchell v. Henry Hudson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999639878-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00406-JAG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999720113]. Mailed to: Paul Mitchell. [15-1871]
Appeal: 15-1871
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/17/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1871
PAUL A. MITCHELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENRY HUDSON; WILLIAM B. TRAXLER, JR.; JAMES C. DEVER, III;
PHILIP A. BADDOUR, JR.; KAY ALBERTSON; JOSHUA M. KRASNER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00406-JAG)
Submitted:
December 15, 2015
Before GREGORY
Circuit Judge.
and
FLOYD,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
December 17, 2015
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul A. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1871
Doc: 11
Filed: 12/17/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Paul
A.
Mitchell
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing his complaint in part and transferring the remaining
claims to the Eastern District of North Carolina pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1404(a) (2012).
no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Mitchell v. Hudson, No. 3:15-cv-
00406-JAG (E.D. Va. July 29, 2015).
motion for a restraining order. *
We further deny Mitchell’s
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
To the extent that Mitchell seeks to disqualify Chief
Judge Traxler from this appeal, because Chief Judge Traxler has
had no involvement in this appeal, we deny the motion as moot.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?