Paul A. Mitchell v. Henry Hudson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999639878-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00406-JAG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999720113]. Mailed to: Paul Mitchell. [15-1871]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1871 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/17/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1871 PAUL A. MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRY HUDSON; WILLIAM B. TRAXLER, JR.; JAMES C. DEVER, III; PHILIP A. BADDOUR, JR.; KAY ALBERTSON; JOSHUA M. KRASNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00406-JAG) Submitted: December 15, 2015 Before GREGORY Circuit Judge. and FLOYD, Decided: Circuit Judges, December 17, 2015 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul A. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1871 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/17/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Paul A. Mitchell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint in part and transferring the remaining claims to the Eastern District of North Carolina pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (2012). no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Hudson, No. 3:15-cv- 00406-JAG (E.D. Va. July 29, 2015). motion for a restraining order. * We further deny Mitchell’s We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent that Mitchell seeks to disqualify Chief Judge Traxler from this appeal, because Chief Judge Traxler has had no involvement in this appeal, we deny the motion as moot. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?