In re: Chase Hunter


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [999677246-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999635772-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999635768-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00903-CMH-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999684147].. [15-1876]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1876 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1876 In re: CHASE CARMEN HUNTER Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. 1:15-cv-00903-CMH-TCB) Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chase Carmen Hunter, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1876 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/22/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Chase Carmen Hunter petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on her motion for injunctive relief. She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We conclude the present in court. record does not reveal undue delay the district Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We also deny as moot Hunter’s motion to expedite the decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?