In re: Chase Hunter
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [999677246-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999635772-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999635768-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00903-CMH-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999684147].. [15-1876]
Appeal: 15-1876
Doc: 11
Filed: 10/22/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1876
In re:
CHASE CARMEN HUNTER
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(No. 1:15-cv-00903-CMH-TCB)
Submitted:
October 20, 2015
Decided:
October 22, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chase Carmen Hunter, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1876
Doc: 11
Filed: 10/22/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Chase
Carmen
Hunter
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
her motion for injunctive relief.
She seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act.
We conclude the
present
in
court.
record
does
not
reveal
undue
delay
the
district
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition.
We also deny as moot
Hunter’s motion to expedite the decision.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?