In re: Lemoyne Veney
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999656816-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999650938-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999638710-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999646015-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cr-00691-RDB-1,1:14-cv-02324-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Lemoyne Veney FCI MORGANTOWN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 1000 Morgantown, WV 26507-1000. [15-1900]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
LEMOYNE VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(Nos. 1:11-cr-00691-RDB-1; 1:14-cv-02324-RDB)
October 20, 2015
October 22, 2015
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lemoyne Veney, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Lemoyne Veney petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion
He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act.
We find the present record
does not reveal undue delay in the district court.
We dispense with oral argument because the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?