In re: Lemoyne Veney

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999656816-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999650938-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999638710-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999646015-2] Originating case number: 1:11-cr-00691-RDB-1,1:14-cv-02324-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999683991]. Mailed to: Lemoyne Veney FCI MORGANTOWN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 1000 Morgantown, WV 26507-1000. [15-1900]

Appeal: 15-1900

Doc: 12

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1900

In re:

LEMOYNE VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(Nos. 1:11-cr-00691-RDB-1; 1:14-cv-02324-RDB)

Submitted:

October 20, 2015

Decided:

October 22, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lemoyne Veney, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-1900

Doc: 12

Filed: 10/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lemoyne Veney petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion

He seeks an order from this court

directing the district court to act.

We find the present record

does not reveal undue delay in the district court.
we

grant

leave

to

mandamus petition.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

proceed

in

forma

pauperis

Accordingly,
and

deny

the

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2