Sharon Weer v. Ethicon, Incorporated
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-03792,2:12-md-02327. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999789536].. [15-1951]
Appeal: 15-1951
Doc: 24
Filed: 04/06/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1951
In Re: ETHICON, INC., PELVIC REPAIR
LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 2327)
SYSTEM
PRODUCTS
-------------------------------------SHARON WEER; THOMAS WEER,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
ETHICON, INCORPORATED; ETHICON, L.L.C.; JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston.
Joseph R. Goodwin,
District Judge. (2:13-cv-03792; 2:12-md-02327)
Submitted:
March 30, 2016
Decided:
April 6, 2016
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas R. Plymale, DUGAN LAW FIRM, PLC, New Orleans, Louisiana,
for Appellants. David B. Thomas, Daniel R. Higginbotham, THOMAS
COMBS & SPANN PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Christy Jones,
John C. Henegan, Sr., Susanna Moore Moldoveanu, BUTLER SNOW LLP,
Ridgeland, Mississippi, for Appellees.
Appeal: 15-1951
Doc: 24
Filed: 04/06/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-1951
Doc: 24
Filed: 04/06/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Sharon Weer and Thomas Weer appeal the district court’s
order dismissing this action without prejudice because the Weers
failed to timely effect service of process.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Weer v. Ethicon,
Inc., Nos. 2:13-cv-03792; 2:12-md-02327 (S.D. W. Va. July 23,
2015).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?