Sharon Weer v. Ethicon, Incorporated

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-03792,2:12-md-02327. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999789536].. [15-1951]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1951 Doc: 24 Filed: 04/06/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1951 In Re: ETHICON, INC., PELVIC REPAIR LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 2327) SYSTEM PRODUCTS -------------------------------------SHARON WEER; THOMAS WEER, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. ETHICON, INCORPORATED; ETHICON, L.L.C.; JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, District Judge. (2:13-cv-03792; 2:12-md-02327) Submitted: March 30, 2016 Decided: April 6, 2016 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas R. Plymale, DUGAN LAW FIRM, PLC, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Appellants. David B. Thomas, Daniel R. Higginbotham, THOMAS COMBS & SPANN PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Christy Jones, John C. Henegan, Sr., Susanna Moore Moldoveanu, BUTLER SNOW LLP, Ridgeland, Mississippi, for Appellees. Appeal: 15-1951 Doc: 24 Filed: 04/06/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-1951 Doc: 24 Filed: 04/06/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Sharon Weer and Thomas Weer appeal the district court’s order dismissing this action without prejudice because the Weers failed to timely effect service of process. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Weer v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:13-cv-03792; 2:12-md-02327 (S.D. W. Va. July 23, 2015). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?