Alexei Bykhovski v. NeuroCog Trial

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motions to supplement record [999676105-2], [999739406-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00378-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999788529]. [15-1952]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1952 Doc: 44 Filed: 04/05/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1952 ALEXEI BYKHOVSKI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEUROCOG TRIALS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00378-BO) Submitted: March 31, 2016 Decided: April 5, 2016 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexei Bykhovski, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey William Sheehan, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Nashville, Tennessee; Scott Burnett Smith, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Huntsville, Alabama, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1952 Doc: 44 Filed: 04/05/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Alexei Bykhovski appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Bykhovski’s complaint alleging that Defendant discriminated against him based on his sex and age when making certain hiring decisions. We have reviewed Accordingly, we the deny record and Bykhovski’s find no motions reversible to error. supplement record and affirm the district court’s judgment. the Bykhovski v. NeuroCog Trials, No. 5:14-cv-00378-BO (E.D.N.C. July 22, 2015). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?