Alexei Bykhovski v. NeuroCog Trial
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motions to supplement record [999676105-2], [999739406-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00378-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999788529]. [15-1952]
Appeal: 15-1952
Doc: 44
Filed: 04/05/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1952
ALEXEI BYKHOVSKI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NEUROCOG TRIALS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00378-BO)
Submitted:
March 31, 2016
Decided:
April 5, 2016
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexei Bykhovski, Appellant Pro Se.
Jeffrey William Sheehan,
BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Nashville, Tennessee; Scott
Burnett Smith, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Huntsville,
Alabama, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1952
Doc: 44
Filed: 04/05/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Alexei
Bykhovski
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Bykhovski’s
complaint
alleging
that
Defendant
discriminated
against
him
based on his sex and age when making certain hiring decisions.
We
have
reviewed
Accordingly,
we
the
deny
record
and
Bykhovski’s
find
no
motions
reversible
to
error.
supplement
record and affirm the district court’s judgment.
the
Bykhovski v.
NeuroCog Trials, No. 5:14-cv-00378-BO (E.D.N.C. July 22, 2015).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?