Chadwick Myers v. Commissioner of IRS


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to strike appellant's brief and exhibits [999668480-2]; denying Motion to impose sanctions [999688811-2]. Originating case number: 30321-13 L. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999737250]. Mailed to: Chadwick David Myers. [15-1967]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1967 Doc: 15 Filed: 01/19/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1967 CHADWICK DAVID MYERS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. Submitted: January 14, 2016 (Tax Ct. No. 30321-13L) Decided: January 19, 2016 Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chadwick David Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Haungs, Supervisory Attorney, Marion Elizabeth Erickson, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1967 Doc: 15 Filed: 01/19/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Chadwick David Myers appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s proposed levy action with respect to his income tax liability for the tax years 2003 through 2009, and imposing a penalty against Myers for making frivolous arguments, 26 U.S.C. § 6673 (2012). the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Myers v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 30321-13L (U.S.T.C. May 28, 2015). the Commissioner’s sanctions. motions to strike Myers’ brief We deny and for We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?