Beverley D. Wilson v. Jason T. Mo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-02230-MBS,3:13-cv-03567-MBS,10-01218-hb,14-80054-hb Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999737552]. Mailed to: Beverley D. Wilson P. O. Box 2865 Orangeburg, SC 29116. [15-1983]

Appeal: 15-1983

Doc: 11

Filed: 01/19/2016

Pg: 1 of 4

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1983

In re: BEVERLEY D. WILSON,
Debtor,
----------------------BEVERLEY D. WILSON, a/k/a Beverley Deloris Duncan-Wilson,
a/k/a Beverley Deloris Duncan-Stewart, a/k/a Beverley
Deloris Stewart, d/b/a/ Wilson Pediatrics Incorporated,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JASON T. MOSS; MOSS AND ASSOCIATES PA,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg.
Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (5:15-cv-02230-MBS)

Submitted:

January 14, 2016

Decided:

January 19, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Beverley D. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Jason T. Moss, MOSS &
ASSOCIATES, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Appeal: 15-1983

Doc: 11

Filed: 01/19/2016

Pg: 2 of 4

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-1983

Doc: 11

Filed: 01/19/2016

Pg: 3 of 4

PER CURIAM:
Beverley

D.

Wilson

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing as untimely her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s
order dismissing her complaint for failure to prosecute.

The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant
to

28

U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B)

(2012).

The

magistrate

judge

recommended that the appeal be dismissed and advised Wilson that
failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could
waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.

Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

Wilson has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.
Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Wilson also appeals the district court’s order denying her
motion

for

extension

of

bankruptcy court’s order.
no reversible error.
the

district

time

to

note

her

appeal

from

the

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

court.

Wilson

v.

(D.S.C. Aug. 26, 2015).
3

Moss,

No.

5:15-cv-02230-MBS

Appeal: 15-1983

Doc: 11

Filed: 01/19/2016

Pg: 4 of 4

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions

are

adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

4