Brad R. Johnson v. Abby Pope

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:13-cv-00078-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999769967]. Mailed to: Brad Johnson 111 SE 14th Street Oak Island, NC 28465 Elci Wijayaningsih 111 SE 14th Street Oak Island, NC 28465 Lee Perla. [15-1992]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1992 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/08/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1992 BRAD R. JOHNSON; ELCI WIJAYANINGSIH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ABBY POPE; ELIZABETH BILETH; WINFORD BARR; THOMAS G. WALKER; JONATHAN D. CARROLL; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:13-cv-00078-BO) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 8, 2016 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brad Johnson, Elci Wijayaningsih, Appellants Pro Se. Lee Perla, Paul Andrew Allulis, Richard Farber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1992 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/08/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Brad R. Johnson and Elci Wijayaningsih appeal the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing their 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (2012) action seeking to recover an alleged overpayment of taxes. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the We have Accordingly, district court. Johnson v. Pope, No. 7:13-cv-00078-BO (E.D.N.C. July 31, 2015). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?