Jerry A. Hurst v. Guy Harbert
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00033-GEC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999737417]. Mailed to: Jerry Hurst. [15-2000]
Appeal: 15-2000
Doc: 5
Filed: 01/19/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2000
JERRY A. HURST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GUY HARBERT, in their individual and official capacities;
MAXWELL WIEGARD, in their individual and official capacities;
MARTY HARBIN, in their individual and official capacities;
COLIN SHALK, in their individual and official capacities;
NICHOLAS SKILES, in their individual and official capacities;
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES 1-10,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00033-GEC)
Submitted:
January 14, 2016
Decided:
January 19, 2016
Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2000
Doc: 5
Filed: 01/19/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry A. Hurst seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying relief on his complaint in which he sought to raise claims
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), the Driver’s Privacy Protection
Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2722, 2724 (2012), and various state laws, and
denying his motion for reconsideration.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
Hurst v. Harbert, No.
5:15-cv-00033-GEC (W.D. Va. June 3, 2015 & Aug. 3, 2015).
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?