Michael Everrett Harris v. Judge Peter J. Messitte
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:12-cv-03807-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999769969]. Mailed to: Michael Everrett Harris 1439 Carol Drive Pomona, CA 91767-4573. [15-2011, 15-2012]
Appeal: 15-2011
Doc: 11
Filed: 03/08/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2011
MICHAEL EVERRETT HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE PETER J. MESSITTE; ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA E. LYNCH,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 15-2012
MICHAEL E. HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. JUDGE PAUL VICTOR NIEMEYER; LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney
General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Roger W. Titus, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-03807-RWT; 8:12-cv-03809-RWT)
Submitted:
January 6, 2016
Decided:
March 8, 2016
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Appeal: 15-2011
Doc: 11
Filed: 03/08/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Everrett Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-2011
Doc: 11
Filed: 03/08/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Michael Everrett Harris appeals the district court’s orders
denying
his
motion
for
relief
to
reopen
closed
civil
cases.
Based on our review of the record in these cases and Harris’
informal briefs on appeal, we conclude that these appeals are
frivolous.
(1989).
See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
See 28 U.S.C.
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?