Mary Roberts v. Jay Robert


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-02099 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999826287]. Mailed to: Mary Roberts. [15-2019]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2019 Doc: 33 Filed: 05/18/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2019 MARY SUE ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAY A. ROBERTS; ASHLEY ROBERTS MCNAMARA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:15-cv-02099) Submitted: April 28, 2016 Decided: May 18, 2016 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry L. Bruce, BARRY L. BRUCE & ASSOCIATES, Lewisburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Michael R. Proctor, DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2019 Doc: 33 Filed: 05/18/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Mary Sue Roberts appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint filed in her Chapter 13 proceeding for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Roberts v. Roberts, No. 5:15-cv-02099 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 5, 2015). We deny Appellant’s motion with for judicial review. We dispense oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?