Mary Roberts v. Jay Robert

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-02099 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999826287]. Mailed to: Mary Roberts. [15-2019]

Appeal: 15-2019

Doc: 33

Filed: 05/18/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2019

MARY SUE ROBERTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAY A. ROBERTS; ASHLEY ROBERTS MCNAMARA,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-02099)

Submitted:

April 28, 2016

Decided:

May 18, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry L. Bruce, BARRY L. BRUCE & ASSOCIATES, Lewisburg, West
Virginia, for Appellant. Michael R. Proctor, DINSMORE & SHOHL,
LLP, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2019

Doc: 33

Filed: 05/18/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mary

Sue

Roberts

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing her complaint filed in her Chapter 13 proceeding for
lack

of

subject

matter

jurisdiction.

We

have

reviewed

the

record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and
find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly,

reasons stated by the district court.

we

affirm

for

the

Roberts v. Roberts, No.

5:15-cv-02099 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 5, 2015).

We deny Appellant’s

motion

with

for

judicial

review.

We

dispense

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2