Mary Roberts v. Jay Robert
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-02099 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999826287]. Mailed to: Mary Roberts. [15-2019]
Appeal: 15-2019
Doc: 33
Filed: 05/18/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2019
MARY SUE ROBERTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAY A. ROBERTS; ASHLEY ROBERTS MCNAMARA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley.
Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-02099)
Submitted:
April 28, 2016
Decided:
May 18, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry L. Bruce, BARRY L. BRUCE & ASSOCIATES, Lewisburg, West
Virginia, for Appellant. Michael R. Proctor, DINSMORE & SHOHL,
LLP, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2019
Doc: 33
Filed: 05/18/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mary
Sue
Roberts
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing her complaint filed in her Chapter 13 proceeding for
lack
of
subject
matter
jurisdiction.
We
have
reviewed
the
record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
Roberts v. Roberts, No.
5:15-cv-02099 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 5, 2015).
We deny Appellant’s
motion
with
for
judicial
review.
We
dispense
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?