Elbert Hicks v. U. S. Dept. of Labor
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00651-MSD-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999704677]. Mailed to: Elbert Hicks. [15-2072]
Appeal: 15-2072
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/23/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2072
ELBERT HICKS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; U.S. POSTAL SERVICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:14-cv-00651-MSD-LRL)
Submitted:
November 19, 2015
Decided:
November 23, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elbert Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.
Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2072
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/23/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Elbert Hicks appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his civil action.
We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
2:14-cv-00651-MSD-LRL
July 24, 2015).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
See Hicks v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, No.
(E.D.
Va.
filed
July
23,
2015,
entered
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?