Alfred Adjin v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A200-886-422. Copies to all parties and the agency. [999850947]. [15-2088]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2088 Doc: 25 Filed: 06/13/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2088 ALFRED AYITEY ADJIN, a/k/a Emmanuel Ayitey Kwaku Safo Boateng, a/k/a Alfred A. Adjin, Adjin, a/k/a Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: May 10, 2016 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. FLOYD, Decided: Circuit Judges, and June 13, 2016 DAVIS, Senior Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, Matthew A. Connelly, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2088 Doc: 25 Filed: 06/13/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Alfred Ayitey Adjin, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) judge’s denial dismissing of his his motion appeal for a from the continuance Adjin’s motion for administrative closure. record and find no abuse of discretion. immigration and denying We have reviewed the We further find that Adjin cannot demonstrate a violation of his due process rights as he fails to show the requisite prejudice. Mukasey, 535 F.3d 243, 256 (4th Cir. 2008). deny the Board. petition for review for the reasons See Anim v. Accordingly, we stated See In re Adjin (B.I.A. Aug. 19, 2015). by the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?