Alfred Adjin v. Loretta Lynch
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A200-886-422. Copies to all parties and the agency. [999850947]. [15-2088]
Appeal: 15-2088
Doc: 25
Filed: 06/13/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2088
ALFRED AYITEY ADJIN, a/k/a Emmanuel Ayitey
Kwaku Safo Boateng, a/k/a Alfred A. Adjin,
Adjin,
a/k/a
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
May 10, 2016
Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.
FLOYD,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
and
June 13, 2016
DAVIS,
Senior
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy
Assistant
Attorney
General,
Mary
Jane
Candaux,
Assistant
Director, Matthew A. Connelly, Office of Immigration Litigation,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2088
Doc: 25
Filed: 06/13/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Alfred
Ayitey
Adjin,
a
native
and
citizen
of
Ghana,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals
(Board)
judge’s
denial
dismissing
of
his
his
motion
appeal
for
a
from
the
continuance
Adjin’s motion for administrative closure.
record and find no abuse of discretion.
immigration
and
denying
We have reviewed the
We further find that
Adjin cannot demonstrate a violation of his due process rights
as
he
fails
to
show
the
requisite
prejudice.
Mukasey, 535 F.3d 243, 256 (4th Cir. 2008).
deny
the
Board.
petition
for
review
for
the
reasons
See
Anim
v.
Accordingly, we
stated
See In re Adjin (B.I.A. Aug. 19, 2015).
by
the
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
the
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?