Emma Victoria Johnson Howard v. Vance County Sheriff Dept.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00110-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999713155]. Mailed to: Emma Victoria Howard P. O. Box 51808 Durham, NC 27717. [15-2100]
Appeal: 15-2100
Doc: 16
Filed: 12/07/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2100
EMMA VICTORIA JOHNSON HOWARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VANCE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.; W. B. LILLEY, Sergeant of the
Vance County Sheriff's Dept., Individually and in his
officially capacity; VANCE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT; RAYMOND
EARL DICKERSON, d/b/a T.L. Perkinson Wrecker Service,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00110-FL)
Submitted:
November 19, 2015
Decided:
December 7, 2015
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emma Victoria Howard, Appellant Pro Se.
WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC,
Carolina, for Appellees.
Sonny Sade Haynes,
Winston-Salem, North
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2100
Doc: 16
Filed: 12/07/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Emma Victoria Johnson Howard seeks to appeal the district
court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to
dismiss Howard’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action in part and to
allow
certain
claims
to
proceed.
This
court
may
exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
to
appeal
is
neither
a
final
interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
order
The order Howard seeks
nor
an
appealable
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?