MFR Company, L.C. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00407-CMH-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999925206].. [15-2115]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2115 Doc: 25 Filed: 09/08/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2115 MFR COMPANY, L.C., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for Fremont 2003-1, Asset-Backed Certificate, Series 2003-1; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; SUSAN BRASSFIELD-HAUSENFLECK, a/k/a Susan Brassfield; MICHAEL HAUSENFLECK; TRUSTEE SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00407-CMH-IDD) Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: September 8, 2016 Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher J. Williams, VOGELMAN, TURNER, & WRIGHT, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Maryia Y. Jones, John C. Lynch, Jason E. Manning, Andrew B. Pittman, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2115 Doc: 25 Filed: 09/08/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: The court’s Appellant, order MFR granting Company, the L.C., Appellees’ appeals motion the to district dismiss the complaint and denying MFR’s motion to remand the case to state court. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. MFR Co., L.C. v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust, No. 1:15-cv-00407-CMHIDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?