MFR Company, L.C. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00407-CMH-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999925206].. [15-2115]
Appeal: 15-2115
Doc: 25
Filed: 09/08/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2115
MFR COMPANY, L.C.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for
Fremont 2003-1, Asset-Backed Certificate, Series 2003-1;
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; SUSAN BRASSFIELD-HAUSENFLECK,
a/k/a
Susan
Brassfield;
MICHAEL
HAUSENFLECK;
TRUSTEE
SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00407-CMH-IDD)
Submitted:
July 21, 2016
Decided:
September 8, 2016
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher J. Williams, VOGELMAN, TURNER, & WRIGHT, P.C.,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Maryia Y. Jones, John C.
Lynch, Jason E. Manning, Andrew B. Pittman, TROUTMAN SANDERS,
LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2115
Doc: 25
Filed: 09/08/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
The
court’s
Appellant,
order
MFR
granting
Company,
the
L.C.,
Appellees’
appeals
motion
the
to
district
dismiss
the
complaint and denying MFR’s motion to remand the case to state
court.
error.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
MFR
Co., L.C. v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust, No. 1:15-cv-00407-CMHIDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?