Joseph Boykin v. Commonwealth of Virginia
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999709954-2]; denying Motion to schedule oral argument [999709963-2]. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00811-HEH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency . Mailed to: Joseph L. Boykin. [15-2123]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH L. BOYKIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE;
ANDREW BLOCK, Director, in his official and individual
capacity; MARK GOOCH, Director, in his individual capacity;
ERIC TIGNOR, Department Investigator, in his official and
individual capacity; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
JUVENILE JUSTICE, BEAUMONT JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL CENTER;
individual capacity; CHARLES DOCKERY, Superintendent, in his
Superintendent, in his individual capacity; AARON DIXON,
Assistant Superintendent, in his official capacity; LAKARA
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
February 29, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
March 9, 2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Joseph L. Boykin, Appellant Pro Se.
Ryan Spreague Hardy,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Boykin’s miscellaneous motions.
We have reviewed the record and
reasons stated by the district court.
Boykin v. Commonwealth of
Va. Dep’t of Juvenile Justice, No. 3:14-cv-00811-HEH (E.D. Va.
Aug. 20, 2015).
We deny Boykin’s motion for appointment of
We deny his motion to schedule oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?