Joseph Boykin v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999709954-2]; denying Motion to schedule oral argument [999709963-2]. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00811-HEH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999770694]. Mailed to: Joseph L. Boykin. [15-2123]
Appeal: 15-2123
Doc: 14
Filed: 03/09/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2123
JOSEPH L. BOYKIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE;
ANDREW BLOCK, Director, in his official and individual
capacity; MARK GOOCH, Director, in his individual capacity;
ERIC TIGNOR, Department Investigator, in his official and
individual capacity; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
JUVENILE JUSTICE, BEAUMONT JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL CENTER;
PEGGY
PARRISH,
Superintendent,
in
her
official
and
individual capacity; CHARLES DOCKERY, Superintendent, in his
individual
capacity;
DAVID
GRUBICH,
Assistant
Superintendent, in his individual capacity; AARON DIXON,
Assistant Superintendent, in his official capacity; LAKARA
JOHNSON,
Lieutenant,
in
her
official
and
individual
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00811-HEH)
Submitted:
February 29, 2016
Decided:
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
March 9, 2016
Appeal: 15-2123
Doc: 14
Filed: 03/09/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Joseph L. Boykin, Appellant Pro Se.
Ryan Spreague Hardy,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-2123
Doc: 14
Filed: 03/09/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Joseph
substituting
motion
to
L.
Boykin
proper
dismiss
appeals
no
Boykin’s
reversible
district
party-defendants,
complaint,
Boykin’s miscellaneous motions.
find
the
error.
court’s
granting
and
orders
Defendants’
denying
as
moot
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
Boykin v. Commonwealth of
Va. Dep’t of Juvenile Justice, No. 3:14-cv-00811-HEH (E.D. Va.
Aug. 20, 2015).
counsel.
We deny Boykin’s motion for appointment of
We deny his motion to schedule oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?