In re: Billy Lunsford
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999665761-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999677957-2] Originating case number: 2:10-cr-00182-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999737534]. Mailed to: Billy Lunsford. [15-2126]
Appeal: 15-2126
Doc: 7
Filed: 01/19/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2126
In re:
BILLY E. LUNSFORD, a/k/a Peg-leg,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted:
January 14, 2016
(2:10-cr-00182-1)
Decided:
January 19, 2016
Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy E. Lunsford, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2126
Doc: 7
Filed: 01/19/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Billy E. Lunsford petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2012) motion.
He seeks an order from this court directing
the district court to act.
Our review of the district court’s
docket reveals that the district court denied Lunsford’s motion on
December 4, 2015.
Accordingly, because the district court has
recently decided Lunsford’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as
moot.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?