Ronald Emrit v. Maryland State Bar Association

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999673897-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-02548-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999720149].. [15-2131]

Appeal: 15-2131

Doc: 8

Filed: 12/17/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2131

RONALD SATISH EMRIT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION; AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION; NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF
BAR EXAMINERS,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-02548-JKB)

Submitted:

December 15, 2015

Before GREGORY
Circuit Judge.

and

FLOYD,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

December 17, 2015

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 15-2131

Doc: 8

Filed: 12/17/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ronald

Satish

Emrit

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)
(2012).
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis

and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Md.

Emrit v. Md. State Bar Ass’n., No. 1:15-cv-02548-JKB (D.

filed

Sept.

10,

2015

&

entered

Sept.

11,

2015);

see

Shailendra Kumar, P.A. v. Dhanda, 43 A.3d 1029, 1039-41 (Md.
2012)

(addressing

tolling).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2