Balal Services Trust v. William Stacey, Sr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999685122-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00046-CCE-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999794337]. Mailed to: William Stacey, Sr., Robert Tomchin. [15-2135]
Appeal: 15-2135
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/13/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2135
BALAL SERVICES TRUST,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM CLIFTON STACEY, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
FREIDA B. STACEY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00046-CCE-LPA)
Submitted:
March 31, 2016
Decided:
April 13, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 15-2135
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/13/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
William Clifton Stacey, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Ira Klein,
Robert Gregory Tomchin, CRANFORD, SCHULTZE, TOMCHIN & ALLEN, PA,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 15-2135
Doc: 10
Filed: 04/13/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
William
Stacey,
Sr.,
appeals
the
district
court’s
granting the Government’s motion for default judgment.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
order
We have
Accordingly,
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the
reasons
stated
by
the
district
court.
Balal
Servs.
Tr.
v.
Stacey, No. 1:15-cv-00046-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2015); see
Fed. R. Civ. P. 55; 28 U.S.C. § 3304(b)(1)(A), (B) (2012); N.C.
Gen. Stat. § 39-23.4 (2015).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?