In Re: Daniel Brown

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999678222-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999670073-2] Originating case number: 4:14-cv-03659-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999762101]. Mailed to: Daniel Brown. [15-2162]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2162 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/25/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2162 In re: DANIEL BROWN, a/k/a Daniel M. Brown, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:14-cv-03659-BHH) Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Brown, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2162 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/25/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Brown petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging unreasonable delay by the district court and seeking an order directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet discloses that a final order was entered on October 20, 2015, denying relief on Brown’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and his motion to alter or amend the judgment. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?