In Re: Daniel Brown
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999678222-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999670073-2] Originating case number: 4:14-cv-03659-BHH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999762101]. Mailed to: Daniel Brown. [15-2162]
Appeal: 15-2162
Doc: 11
Filed: 02/25/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2162
In re: DANIEL BROWN, a/k/a Daniel M. Brown,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(4:14-cv-03659-BHH)
Submitted:
February 23, 2016
Decided:
February 25, 2016
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Brown, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2162
Doc: 11
Filed: 02/25/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Brown petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
unreasonable delay by the district court and seeking an order
directing the district court to act.
Our review of the district
court’s docket sheet discloses that a final order was entered on
October 20, 2015, denying relief on Brown’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(2012) petition and his motion to alter or amend the judgment.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
deny
the
mandamus
petition
as
moot.
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?