In Re: Terry Johnson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999682460-2]; dismissing Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) filed by Petitioner Terry Donnell Johnson [999670457-2] Originating case number: 3:08-cv-00484-RJC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999794426]. Mailed to: T. Johnson. [15-2167]
Appeal: 15-2167
Doc: 6
Filed: 04/13/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2167
In Re:
TERRY DONNELL JOHNSON, a/k/a Little Terry,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:08-cv-00484-RJC)
Submitted:
March 29, 2016
Decided:
April 13, 2016
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry Donnell Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2167
Doc: 6
Filed: 04/13/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Terry Johnson petitions this court for a writ of mandamus,
seeking
an
order
directing
the
district
court
to
rule
motion to reopen his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
on
a
District
court records disclose that Johnson’s motion was construed as a
separate § 2255 motion to which the court assigned a different
docket number (No. 3:15-cv-466-RJC).
In an order entered on
October
that
8,
2015,
the
court
observed
the
second
§ 2255
motion was successive and unauthorized, construed the motion as
a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) motion, and transferred the matter to
the Middle District of Florida, where Johnson is incarcerated.
Because the district court has acted on Johnson’s motion to
reopen, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the mandamus petition as moot.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in
the
materials
before
us
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?