Jamaal Gittens v. State of South Carolina

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-02841-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999764063]. Mailed to: Jamaal Gittens 1206 Marlene Street Charlotte, NC 28208. [15-2206, 15-2294]

Appeal: 15-2206

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2206

JAMAAL GITTENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-2294

JAMAAL GITTENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia and Greenville.
Mary G. Lewis,
District Judge. (3:15-cv-02841-MGL; 6:15-cv-03108-MGL)

Submitted:

February 25, 2016

Decided:

February 29, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Appeal: 15-2206

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-2206

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/29/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s orders accepting
the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints.
records and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

Gittens v. South

Carolina, No. 3:15-cv-02841-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015); Gittens
v. South Carolina, No. 6:15-cv-03108-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2015).
We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3