Theresa Washington v. Richard O'Neal

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999689724-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00135-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999778123]. Mailed to: Theresa Washington 220 Christiana Road New Castle, DE 19720. [15-2223]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2223 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2223 THERESA WASHINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD O’NEAL, Market Manager c/o Walmart; LOREN ROOS; ALEX BARRON; TERESSA CHAMBERS; JOHN ENGEL; JASON TANNER; DEBORAH PATRICK, c/o Walmart, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00135-JFM) Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theresa Washington, Appellant Pro Henninger, Kevin Michael Kraham, Washington, DC, for Appellees. Se. Sarah Elizabeth LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2223 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Theresa Washington appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to appoint counsel, which the court construed as a motion to reopen her civil action. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. O’Neal, No. 1:15- cv-00135-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?