Theresa Washington v. Richard O'Neal
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999689724-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00135-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999778123]. Mailed to: Theresa Washington 220 Christiana Road New Castle, DE 19720. [15-2223]
Appeal: 15-2223
Doc: 13
Filed: 03/21/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2223
THERESA WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD O’NEAL, Market Manager c/o Walmart; LOREN ROOS; ALEX
BARRON; TERESSA CHAMBERS; JOHN ENGEL; JASON TANNER; DEBORAH
PATRICK, c/o Walmart,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00135-JFM)
Submitted:
March 17, 2016
Decided:
March 21, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Theresa
Washington,
Appellant
Pro
Henninger,
Kevin
Michael
Kraham,
Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Se.
Sarah
Elizabeth
LITTLER
MENDELSON
PC,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2223
Doc: 13
Filed: 03/21/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Theresa
Washington
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying her motion to appoint counsel, which the court construed
as a motion to reopen her civil action.
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly,
we
grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Washington v. O’Neal, No. 1:15-
cv-00135-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2015).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?