Kenneth A. Greene v. Barack Obama

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00658-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999764033]. Mailed to: Kenneth A. Greene 3423 St. Ambrose Avenue Baltimore, MD 21215. [15-2259]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2259 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2259 KENNETH A. GREENE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARACK OBAMA, President; ANTHONY FOXX, Secretary; FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE; NANCY L. SPENCER GRIGSBY, in their individual and official capacities; GERARD R. VETTER, in their individual and official capacities; RONALD A. WRAY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00658-RDB) Submitted: February 25, 2016 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Circuit Decided: Judges, February 29, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth A. Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2259 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth dismissing A. his Greene appeals complaint the purporting district to court’s raise orders several civil claims against Defendants, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and agree that Greene’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. orders. We thus affirm the district court’s Greene v. Obama, No. 1:15-cv-00658-RDB (D. Md. Mar. 25, 2015; Sept. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?