Kenneth A. Greene v. Barack Obama
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00658-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999764033]. Mailed to: Kenneth A. Greene 3423 St. Ambrose Avenue Baltimore, MD 21215. [15-2259]
Appeal: 15-2259
Doc: 6
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2259
KENNETH A. GREENE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BARACK OBAMA, President; ANTHONY FOXX, Secretary; FEDERAL
ELECTION COMMISSION; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; U.S. OFFICE OF
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE;
NANCY L. SPENCER GRIGSBY, in their individual and official
capacities; GERARD R. VETTER, in their individual and
official capacities; RONALD A. WRAY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:15-cv-00658-RDB)
Submitted:
February 25, 2016
Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
February 29, 2016
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth A. Greene, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2259
Doc: 6
Filed: 02/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth
dismissing
A.
his
Greene
appeals
complaint
the
purporting
district
to
court’s
raise
orders
several
civil
claims against Defendants, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and
agree that Greene’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted.
orders.
We thus affirm the district court’s
Greene v. Obama, No. 1:15-cv-00658-RDB (D. Md. Mar. 25,
2015; Sept. 17, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?