In Re: Edward Hill
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999700611-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999682872-2] Originating case number: 4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-9 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999778157]. Mailed to: Edward Hill. [15-2282]
Appeal: 15-2282
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/21/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2282
In re:
EDWARD ALPHONSE HILL, a/k/a Puddin,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-9)
Submitted:
March 17, 2016
Decided:
March 21, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Alphonse Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-2282
Doc: 9
Filed: 03/21/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Edward
Alphonse
Hill
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
motion
for
transcripts,
and
proceed in forma pauperis.
directing
the
transcripts.
that
the
district
he
has
filed
an
application
to
Hill seeks an order from this court
court
to
act
on
his
motion
for
Our review of the district court’s docket reveals
district
court
has
since
denied
Hill’s
motion.
Accordingly, although we grant Hill’s application to proceed in
forma
pauperis,
dispense
with
contentions
are
we
oral
deny
the
argument
adequately
mandamus
petition
because
presented
in
the
the
as
facts
moot.
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?