In Re: Edward Hill

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999700611-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999682872-2] Originating case number: 4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-9 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999778157]. Mailed to: Edward Hill. [15-2282]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2282 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2282 In re: EDWARD ALPHONSE HILL, a/k/a Puddin, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-9) Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Alphonse Hill, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-2282 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Edward Alphonse Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for transcripts, and proceed in forma pauperis. directing the transcripts. that the district he has filed an application to Hill seeks an order from this court court to act on his motion for Our review of the district court’s docket reveals district court has since denied Hill’s motion. Accordingly, although we grant Hill’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, dispense with contentions are we oral deny the argument adequately mandamus petition because presented in the the as facts moot. We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?