Sheila Simms v. Chuck Hagel

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00433-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999778118]. Mailed to: Sheila C. Simms 10910 Centennial Road Disputanta, VA 23842-6613. [15-2292]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-2292 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2292 SHEILA C. SIMMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHUCK HAGEL, Secretary, Logistics Agency, Department of Defense, Defense Defendant – Appellee, and DEBORAH A. WOLFE, Richmond; JULIA A. Aviation Richmond, Defense Logistics Agency, Aviation BRANDON, Defense Logistics Agency, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00433-REP) Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sheila C. Simms, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appeal: 15-2292 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-2292 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/21/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Sheila C. Simms appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint raising claims under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simms v. Hagel, No. 3:14-cv-00433-REP (E.D. Va. Aug. 20, 2015). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?