Christie Ademiluyi v. CitiMortgage, Incorporated

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-00777-JFM,14-00806. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999786731]. [15-2296]

Appeal: 15-2296

Doc: 29

Filed: 04/01/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2296

In Re: CHRISTIE M. ADEMILUYI,
Debtor.
----------------------------CHRISTIE M. ADEMILUYI,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED; PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC, f/k/a
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings, I LLC, by
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC its servicing agent; PENNYMAC
CORP., by PennyMac Loan Services, LLC its servicing agent;
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC,
Defendants – Appellees,
TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN,
Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (8:15-cv-00777-JFM; 14-00806)

Submitted:

March 28, 2016

Decided:

April 1, 2016

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 15-2296

Doc: 29

Filed: 04/01/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

April T. Ademiluyi, LAW OFFICE OF APRIL T. ADEMILUYI, Bethesda,
Maryland, for Appellant.
Robert A. Scott, BALLARD SPAHR LLP,
Baltimore, Maryland; John Lucian, BLANK ROME LLP, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-2296

Doc: 29

Filed: 04/01/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Christie

M.

Ademiluyi

appeals

from

the

district

court’s

orders dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim,
Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

12(b)(6),

because,

among

other

things,

she

lacked standing to challenge the transfer of her mortgage note.
She also appeals from the district court’s order denying her
motion for leave to amend her complaint.

The court determined

that, because she lacked standing, amendment would be futile.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

the

arguments

appeal, and we find no reversible error.
substantially

for

the

reasons

stated

presented

on

Accordingly, we affirm
by

the

district

court.

Ademiluyi v. Citimortgage, Inc., No. 8:15-cv-00777-JFM (D. Md.
Sept. 29, 2015 & Oct. 20, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3